Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S05EE
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 19:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 99.9
53% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 195
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 206
Write 46.4
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 46.6
21% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 27.6
94% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 70.4
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 42.2
35% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
684GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 76 79 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 78.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 77.4
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback