Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 15:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 175
76% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 306
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 30.2
21% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 31
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 8.8 31 99 35 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 423
Write 332
Mixed 301
SusWrite 80.9
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 14.9
37% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST9750423AS 750GB-$74
21GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 52 57 57 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 37
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 55.4
32% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
49GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 90 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 79.3
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 96.4
52% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 60 61 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 62.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 60.6
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback