Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 06:14
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 83 1-Core 148 2-Core 297 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 860 91% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,101 68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 116 Parallax 98.8 90% 108 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 145 143 154 156 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 490 Mixed 332 SusWrite 186 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 59.3 205% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 339 261% 356 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 114%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 998GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 176 176 177 176 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 185 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 177 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 746GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 50 49 51 48 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 89.7 Write 47.7 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 51.1 44% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 62%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB 7,915 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 129GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 100 98 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 119 Write 115 Mixed 77 SusWrite 99.7 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 130GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 37.2 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 37.9 48% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 32.9 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 31.8 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)