PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 10.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 339A |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130716 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 11 '19 at 02:25 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
|
1.74%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1914 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HP S600 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC0810H1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1 18 18 67 39 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
134GB free
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 94 93 91 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
122GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 16 14 15 15 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 907x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 285x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 418x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 191x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 129x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |