PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus H310M-C/HDMI (all builds) |
Memory | 0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20180322 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 11 '19 at 15:45 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 59 72 74 73 70 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 3x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 3x |
Core i5-8500Intel $173Bench 82%, 43,089 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $453 |