Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120118
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '19 at 05:45
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 140-$9 2,532 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 36 34% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 36 8-Core 33 5% 34.5 Pts	64-Core 38.7 2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a 5,527 User benchmarks, average bench 0% ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 61 64 53 65 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 71.4 Write 59.9 Mixed 38 SusWrite 59.9 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 41%
Samsung SV1604E 160GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 17GB free Firmware: VW100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 29 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 28.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 29.3 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 24%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 38GB free Firmware: 3.16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 30 29 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 45 Write 42.2 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 29.3 27% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 30%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID a209 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 2.9 3.3 3.9 5.8 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.7 6% 6.48 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M3 78T5663EH3-CF7 Corsair VS1GB667D2 3GB 266, 266 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 1.6 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	22x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	8x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353