Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 54.2
40% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 133
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 31
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 26
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 89 73 65 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 147
Write 153
Mixed 145
SusWrite 92.7
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 20.3
55% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 32
26% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 31%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 Ma... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback