HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory121.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 52.3
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 198
62% 117 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 785
70% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,992
123% 1,992 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.94
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.6% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 88.1
68% 87.8 fps
MRender 89.7
Gravity 84.9
Splatting 92.8
73% 89.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,757
Write 252
Mixed 269
162% 759 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 41.8
164% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 329
267% 390 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: KF06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 158 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 158
Mixed 121
SusWrite 158
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 96%
WD WD2001FYYG 2TB
232GB free
Firmware: D1R2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 106
Write 37.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 38.5
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: KF06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 164 164 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 162
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88%
Great: 96%
Wilk GOODRAM 4GB
4GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2 2.4 3.4 3 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 12.4
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.9
5% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 39.5
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback