bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 881 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 05:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 232
38% 271 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 53 46 54 52 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 97.7
Write 91.3
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 52.4
19% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 11.4
36% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 49.1
53% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 23%
Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 146GB
135GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 53 46 54 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 36.8
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback