Asus P7F-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P7F-M  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101202
Uptime24.4 Days
Run DateDec 04 '16 at 00:11
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon X3470
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40% Below average
SC Int 29
SC Float 35.5
SC Mixed 29.1
25% 31.2 Pts
QC Int 132
QC Float 232
QC Mixed 235
45% 200 Pts
MC Int 344
MC Float 392
MC Mixed 378
55% 371 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40%
Great: 70%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-8i 500GB
360GB free
Firmware: 3.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 240GB
140GB free
Firmware: 3.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
ASMT 2105 500GB
202GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 9.89
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.14
19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7F-M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 17%
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Asus P7F-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $65
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback