Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 05:47
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 464
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3122) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 24
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 538
Write 410
Mixed 447
103% 465 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 37
140% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 34.4
91% 189 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 182%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
171GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 121
Write 29.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 28
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
591GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 92
Mixed 69
SusWrite 97.5
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 160 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 160
Mixed 93
SusWrite 162
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
102GB free
Firmware: 81.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 104 108 109 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 105
Write 113
Mixed 66
SusWrite 107
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 143 143 140 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 164
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 143
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 113%
SanDisk SD SDDR-289 64GB
59GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 27 25 25 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 15.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 25.7
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.4
70% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991776 (996776) 8394 991995 (996995) 8394 991776 (996776) 8394 991776 (996776) 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback