| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190912 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '19 at 06:14 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.5%
Good
|
72% 130 Pts
|
56% 477 Pts
|
59% 957 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.2%
Above average
|
54% 72.3 fps
|
60% 73.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 160 158 156 154 155 MB/s
|
61.5%
Good
|
67% 298 MB/s
|
88% 27.6 MB/s
|
176% 217 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
289GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 121 121 121 118 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
85% 118 MB/s
|
140% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.7%
Good
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 420x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 217x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 189x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $697 |