Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 24.1 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 56.8 22% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 138 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 1.69 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000340NS 44X2455 42C0423IBMV 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 535GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 67 80 66 53 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 72.3 Write 75.7 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 62.4 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.2 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 292 14% 292 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	37x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	28x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	6x
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 256GBToshiba $109Bench 85%, 1,725 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 1x4GBUndeBench 20%, 11 samples	4x
L22 02/2012 ACC 1352 8GBUndeBench 30%, 6 samples	3x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUndeBench 22%, 7 samples	2x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $109