Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 44.5 2-Core 88.7 36% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 176 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 14.8 13% 14.5 fps	MRender 14.4 Gravity 15.8 Splatting 0.04 7% 10.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000340NS 44X2455 42C0423IBMV 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 70 70 73 69 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 109 Write 89.9 Mixed 51.4 SusWrite 69.5 58% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	36x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	27x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	6x
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 256GBToshiba $109Bench 85%, 1,725 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 1x4GBUndeBench 20%, 11 samples	4x
L22 02/2012 ACC 1352 8GBUndeBench 30%, 6 samples	3x
99U5584-009.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 31%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $109