PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Inspiron 530 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0FM586 |
Memory | 0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080620 |
Uptime | 6.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 09 '19 at 13:29 |
Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
42.1%
Average
|
35% 50.2 Pts
|
12% 91.9 Pts
|
6% 104 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
MSI(1462 1100) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
0% 0.74 fps
|
1% 0.71 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 250GB-$251
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 34 35 32 31 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
15% 68.1 MB/s
|
73% 25.5 MB/s
|
20% 31.6 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
73GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
52% 70.8 MB/s
|
185% 1.37 MB/s
|
|
![]() Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
111GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 54 52 52 51 52 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
38% 51.5 MB/s
|
189% 1.4 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST340062 0A 400GB
44GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
30% 23.1 MB/s
|
66% 0.8 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST950032 5AS 500GB
105GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 20 20 19 19 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
30% 23.3 MB/s
|
63% 0.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.3%
Very poor
|
13% 4.7 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
39% 104 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 43x |
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 12x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 11x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 7x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 7x |
Radeon HD 3450ATIBench 1%, 4,621 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $136 |