| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-C/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '19 at 03:05 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
80% 141 Pts
|
56% 420 Pts
|
26% 423 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
47.3%
Average
|
50% 55.5 fps
|
41% 49.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 16 9.5 19 17 44 MB/s
|
23.3%
Poor
|
43% 197 MB/s
|
27% 6.4 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 125 128 128 128 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
85% 116 MB/s
|
157% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
96GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 85 87 88 87 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
60% 81.4 MB/s
|
114% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.9%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
58% 69.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-C/BR Builds (Compare 232 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-C/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 38x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $239 |