Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 09:19
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 126
54% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 252
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 905C) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 2.03
5% 4.72 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 4.57
Splatting 4
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0827A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 342 229 16 37 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 468
Write 316
Mixed 16
SusWrite 120
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.3
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback