Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel X64
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration403 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 155
57% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 620
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 1577
98% 1577 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 76
58% 73.7 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 67.3
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e1000 256G 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFC20E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 193 195 193 199 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 758
Write 217
Mixed 305
SusWrite 195
81% 369 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 27
100% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 272
212% 297 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 205%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
383GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 39 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.3
Write 7.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 35.3
8% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
152GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 111 113 113 113 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
267GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 112 112 111 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 54.9
Write 94
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 109
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
194% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 88%
ADATA HD710 2TB
155GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 25.8
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback