Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 19:33
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Memory 25.3
1-Core 1.7
2-Core 119
22% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 46.3
8-Core 68.5
7% 57.4 Pts
64-Core 27.6
2% 27.6 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 1.5GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 15.1.2.47123
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 8.94
6% 7.48 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 10.3
6% 6.34 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 251GB
28GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 146 205 214 180 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 459
Write 263
Mixed 197
SusWrite 200
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 12
43% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 96.2
77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 2.1
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 2.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 284
14% 284 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback