Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 49 2-Core 137 54% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 381 35% 295 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46% Average	Lighting 55 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 77.3 45% 64.4 fps	MRender 61.7 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 52.7 48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 78 19 78 75 16 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 201 Write 96.8 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 76.4 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 10 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 117 67% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 100%
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 84GB free Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 146 95 89 81 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 403 Write 382 Mixed 323 SusWrite 144 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 32.6 124% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 155 128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 162GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 98 100 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 125 Write 138 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 96.9 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.8% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16