Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 23:51
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 70
2-Core 130
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 381
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 55.2
34% 42.4 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 37.3
30% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lenovo SL700 240G 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 96 70 75 25 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 431
Write 328
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 77.8
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 31
82% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 177
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 107%
Lenovo SL700 480G 480GB
75GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 291 252 254 244 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 310
Write 301
Mixed 260
SusWrite 232
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 39.9
136% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 88.9
107% 188 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
46GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 137 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 108
Write 60.5
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 139
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
32GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 133 137 157 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 144
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 14
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback