Lenovo 4298W28

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4298W28  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4298W28
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 09:45
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 219
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DB) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 142 77 76 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 460
Write 386
Mixed 368
SusWrite 148
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 31.8
104% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 34.6
92% 194 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 121%
sobetter Ext 1TB
265GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 25 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 6.7
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 23.6
26% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-144.A00LF 9905469-103.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4298W28 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4298W28

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback