Sony SVF1532Z1EB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony SVF1532Z1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 136
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90BE) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3220
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.62
Parallax 5.22
3% 5.31 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 0.09
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 58 2.1 2.1 2 2.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 465
Write 398
Mixed 365
SusWrite 35.1
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 20.9
102% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 33
50% 87.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 92%
sobetter Ext 1TB
214GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 57 2.1 2.1 2 2.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 385
Mixed 365
SusWrite 35
390% 309 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 20.6
3,290% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 34.1
9,463% 135 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 304%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVF1532Z1EB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sony SVF1532Z1EB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback