Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B250M-Gaming5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 17:06
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 260
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 757
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 36.7
32% 40.4 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 51.3
64% 82.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 43%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,430
Write 6,183
Mixed 6,768
1,514% 6,794 MB/s
4K Read 451
4K Write 417
4K Mixed 427
1,451% 432 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 1,167
880% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
44GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 328 320 319 319 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 476
Mixed 448
SusWrite 331
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 44.7
181% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
32GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 197 186 187 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 471
Write 183
Mixed 220
SusWrite 190
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 15.2
115% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 29.4
74% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
382GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 597 593 595 1275 896 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 744
Write 593
Mixed 479
SusWrite 920
154% 684 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 55.3
186% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,176
848% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 190%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
243GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 98.7
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 95.1
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 59
SusWrite 73.7
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback