HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	11.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '16 at 22:27
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	MUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 341 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 17 Parallax 17.9 17% 18.6 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 20.8 Splatting 17.9 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
TP00750GB 750GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 158 (03) Spinup time 176 172 4166 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 763 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3436 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 760 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 316 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 446 (C2) HDA temperature 111 103 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	59.7% Above average	Read 119 Write 89.1 Mixed 95.7 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.11 34% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 83%
Seagate ST320LT009-9WC142 320GB 875 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 10GB free Firmware: 1002DEMA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 68 212445544 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2292 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 9 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 4348737517 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3635 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1611 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 53914 (BC) Unknown 100 99 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 522059807 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 67 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 186 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18120 (C2) HDA temperature 31 52 81604378655 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 45 212445544 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 19 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 19 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -85598698206345 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3937944131 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3363256144 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 1 968 (FB) Unknown 100 1 414 (FC) Unknown 100 1 144 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	40.4% Average	Read 69.2 Write 71.5 Mixed 63.5 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.19 61% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 5.98 Mixed 9.47 13% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.19 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 1.06 113% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 99P5471-011.A00LF 14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 16 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	598x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	316x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	142x
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16