bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 19:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 71
2-Core 137
57% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 248
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.15.1.60
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 18.2
2% 7.45 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 8.3
22% 29.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 32GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 59 46 39 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 302
Write 24.2
Mixed 145
SusWrite 47.9
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 17.1
39% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 31.8
24% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback