bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 04:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 19.4
1-Core 64
2-Core 98.1
32% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 327
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 86GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 32 28 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 51.3
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 30.9
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2
316% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 101%
Virtual HD 107GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 41 38 35 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 46.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 40.2
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.6
284% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
3968, 12416 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback