Packard ixtreme M5860

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5860  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard ixtreme M5860
Memory7.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 314
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330
Sapphire(174B 3058) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 2
5% 4.97 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 4.57
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 51 63 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 91.1
Write 94.2
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 73.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 54%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: GU001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 81 90 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 88.1
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 89
50% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5860 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback