Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro2,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemApple MacPro2,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F4208DC8
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5365
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 69.5
37% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 273
24% 205 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1900
AMD(1002 7249) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 2
3% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K2ABCP0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 49 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 42.5
Write 48
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 49.2
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 34%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
6GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 6.1 6.1 5.8 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 23
Write 3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.8
8% 8.62 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro2,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback