Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 21:07
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6420K APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 110
37% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 17.1
11% 15.6 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 17.7
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 48 64 58 57 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 58.3
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 12.2
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 32.7
31% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
66GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 34 42 37 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 71.6
Write 57.3
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 38.6
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
48GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 34 42 37 38 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 107
Write 95.7
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 38.5
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 69%
SANDISK SDDR-489 32GB
29GB free, PID cfc9
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9 9.2 8.8 8.9 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 5.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.7
11% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2
100% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz clocked @ 10123 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback