Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-VG3+  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 02:49
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6420K APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 43.2
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 66.3
32% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 67.9
9% 65.7 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
XFX(1682 2286) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 0.78
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.65
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 86 89 90 109 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 105
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 88.8
57% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 Kingston 9905474-029.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-VG3+ Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback