Intel DP67DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DP67DE__
MotherboardIntel DP67DE  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 16:11
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 23.9
29% 38.9 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 44.4
7% 48.2 Pts
64-Core 58.5
4% 58.5 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus EAH6750
Gigabyte(1458 220F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1801.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 10
Parallax 10.5
10% 11.1 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 9.03
Splatting 11.7
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 5 51 51 6 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 102
SusWrite 40.4
20% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 3
27% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.6
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 27.9
41% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19%
Great: 211%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
193GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 101 108 96 106 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 59.3
Write 6.1
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 99.2
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
244GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 78 80 75 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 20.5
Write 47.4
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 76.2
62% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-025.A00LF Corsair CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 20GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 1.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP67DE Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel DP67DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $904
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback