| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20140707 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '20 at 00:16 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
23.2%
Poor
|
22% 31.5 Pts
|
7% 60.5 Pts
|
5% 85.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
|
0.84%
Terrible
|
1% 1.01 fps
|
1% 1.33 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Neutron XTi 240GB-$149
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 179 176 187 186 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
39% 174 MB/s
|
72% 24.7 MB/s
|
90% 132 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
175GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 95 95 94 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
141% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905428-193.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
19% 6.63 GB/s
|
9% 3.2 GB/s
|
19% 209 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $38 |