| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170824 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '20 at 10:45 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.5%
Good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
37% 280 Pts
|
15% 239 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.4
|
50.3%
Above average
|
50% 70 fps
|
51% 62.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba OCZ TL100 120GB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 5.1 88 5.7 49 5.7 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
38% 176 MB/s
|
101% 33.9 MB/s
|
85% 150 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
111GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 131 132 132 131 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
150% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
|
6.81%
Terrible
|
11% 10.5 MB/s
|
44% 2.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.6%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
20% 6.83 GB/s
|
57% 70.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,956 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,122x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $77Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 642x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 556x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 845x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 471x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 368x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $178 |