Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 15:05
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 948
91% 749 Pts
64-Core 1233
76% 1233 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 45.3
39% 49.8 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 63
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 832 835 827 832 824 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,650
Write 2,202
Mixed 1,828
SusWrite 871
421% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 77.7
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 112
384% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,541
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,395
1,056% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 342%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
134GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,568
Write 2,334
Mixed 1,546
477% 2149 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 106
375% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,636
DQ Write 1,502
DQ Mixed 1,539
1,163% 1,559 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
318GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 482 495 493 493 495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 492
Mixed 366
SusWrite 491
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 47.1
186% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 288
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Dell PERC H310 3TB
149GB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 91
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 95.8
50% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 106%
Dell PERC H310 3TB
15GB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 94 92 90 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 145
Write 80
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 90.9
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 60.1
MC Mixed 31
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 11.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback