Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 05 '17 at 12:54
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 172
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 171
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K120Q
Nvidia(10DE 109C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 369.71
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.66
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 500
Write 447
Mixed 584
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 19.3
72% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 62.4
65% 107 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 64 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback