Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E4E-K09MX
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '20 at 04:25
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40% Below average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 26.7 2-Core 53.6 36% 50.5 Pts	4-Core 54.2 8-Core 61.5 8% 57.8 Pts	64-Core 73.8 5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$74 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 305 357 302 285 323 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 360 Write 319 Mixed 320 SusWrite 306 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 18.6 58% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 102 76% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 127%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	76x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	188x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16