Toshiba Qosmio G50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Qosmio G50  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9550
uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 75.9
42% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 75.5
8-Core 72
10% 73.8 Pts
64-Core 75.3
5% 75.3 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT
Toshiba(1179 0001) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8642
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 150 111 98 149 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 186
Write 218
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 120
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 34.8
60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
452GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 59 60 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 48
Write 67.3
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 60.5
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 128GB
33GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
Read 32.1
Write 25.6
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 25
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.6
549% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio G50 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio G50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback