Today's hottest deals

ECS H87H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H87H3-M4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 02:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 348
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.46
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Hf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 77 64 9.5 84 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 444
Write 372
Mixed 216
SusWrite 65.6
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 21.9
38% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
286GB free
Firmware: 1L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 119 126 129 118 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 152
Mixed 114
SusWrite 125
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M04GD16P1600C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87H3-M4 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H87H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback