| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180226 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '20 at 05:51 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
83% 154 Pts
|
68% 510 Pts
|
30% 482 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
|
50.7%
Above average
|
52% 68.7 fps
|
48% 59.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revuahn 900G 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 36 21 16 27 20 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
51% 231 MB/s
|
12% 3.47 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
651GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 36 31 30 32 32 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
36% 47.8 MB/s
|
109% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.6%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
44% 91.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 795 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 89x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 70x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |