Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3240-$51 10,752 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 173 60% 107 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 175 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645 4,869 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 1029) 1GB CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Lighting 11.3 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 13.5 9% 11.8 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 12.2 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,127 Write 2,452 Mixed 2,344 587% 2,641 MB/s	4K Read 121 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 96.9 364% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 423 DQ Write 413 DQ Mixed 415 313% 417 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 14 6.6 4 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 27.8 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 10 12% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 49%
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60 3,340 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 105GB free Firmware: 3.BHE SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 8.8 11 9.4 4.8 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 31.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 7.8 14% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB 13,591 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,003x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	499x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	193x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	232x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	217x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 7,217 samples	153x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $289

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16