Packard imedia M3710

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Packard imedia M3710 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FMCP7AM
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090903
Uptime	43.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '20 at 10:09
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 56.2 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 65.5 34% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 138 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.85% Terrible	Lighting 9.83 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 11.5 8% 10.2 fps	MRender 13.5 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 13 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 127 38 24 20 21 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 229 Write 185 Mixed 149 SusWrite 61.6 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 27.3 87% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.8 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 48.2 40% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 108%
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 41GB free Firmware: S8FM SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 49 43 43 43 43 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.4% Very poor	Read 58.7 Write 47.7 Mixed 51 SusWrite 44.1 11% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 4.9 17% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 91%
ST1500LM 003-9YH148 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 761GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 37 31 46 23 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.91% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 14.8 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 29.6 22% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia M3710 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia M3710

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $115

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16