Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 125
55% 88 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 571
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 2.69
2% 5.59 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 5.13
6% 7.54 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 903 740 598 605 598 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 900
Mixed 773
SusWrite 713
188% 834 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 73.5
241% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 701
552% 772 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 193%
Great: 296%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
838GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 487 490 489 490 489 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Ct1000p1 SSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 551 567 633 562 559 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 513
Mixed 484
SusWrite 560
116% 515 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 30.9
100% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 129
96% 127 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 26.4
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback