Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 125 55% 88 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 571 62% 490 Pts	64-Core 673 42% 673 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 2.69 2% 5.59 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 5.13 6% 7.54 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 903 740 598 605 598 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 951 Write 900 Mixed 773 SusWrite 713 188% 834 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 73.5 241% 80.8 MB/s	DQ Read 940 DQ Write 674 DQ Mixed 701 552% 772 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 296%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 838GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 487 490 489 490 489 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Ct1000p1 SSD8 1TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 931GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 551 567 633 562 559 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 513 Mixed 484 SusWrite 560 116% 515 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 30.9 100% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 129 96% 127 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 26.4 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,034x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	450x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	276x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	275x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	159x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	115x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	773x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353