Asrock H310M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 08:13
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 655
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 113
Parallax 130
101% 122 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 123
Splatting 104
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 447 445 453 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,004
Write 641
Mixed 781
SusWrite 448
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.5
194% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 854
613% 781 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 161%
Great: 299%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
50GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 440
Mixed 403
SusWrite 105
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 45.1
150% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 282
224% 314 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 125%
Ct1000p1 SSD8 1TB
674GB free
Firmware: R021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 383
Write 216
Mixed 268
SusWrite 89
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 29.2
92% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 37.7
54% 100 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 106 109 109 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 194
Write 158
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 107
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 114%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID a209
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 6 5.9 6 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.9
10% 9.13 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback