Fujitsu ESPRIMO P910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P910  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3162-A1
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 10:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 200
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 388
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E199) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 3.9 20 104 92 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 421
Write 315
Mixed 287
SusWrite 107
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 16.9
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 31.7
36% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
389GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 25 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 98
Write 26.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 26.2
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 57%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
61GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 42 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 42
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.9
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Toshiba External USB HDD 640GB
94GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Read 2
Write 1.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.7
2% 1.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 M378B5673EH1-CF8 M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CK0 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P910 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback