Biostar H81MHV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H81MHV3 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	9.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 10:23
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 85.3 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 112 59% 91.7 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 204 19% 158 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372D) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 29.7 28% 29.9 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 31.8 Splatting 31 27% 33 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 414 Write 360 Mixed 321 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 35.7 116% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 147 141% 225 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 126GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,407 Write 24 Mixed 43.3 829% 1,158 MB/s	4K Read 324 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 13,665% 109 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLGF65F-C8KJB 1337 FLGF65F-D8KQB 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	125x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	86x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	85x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	144x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	75x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	64x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16