Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 16:20
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 758
82% 650 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 190
Parallax 168
139% 176 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 169
Splatting 119
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,900
Write 2,160
Mixed 1,299
399% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 77.7
257% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 1,272
DQ Mixed 1,152
866% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
14GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 438
Mixed 407
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 41.8
141% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 275
221% 312 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
212GB free
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 207 223 224 224 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 1,437
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 206
247% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 45.6
198% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 578
499% 741 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 179%
Great: 248%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
69GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 82 89 81 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 66.8
Write 138
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 84.1
57% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
159GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 136 128 138 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 90
Write 182
Mixed 30
SusWrite 130
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 132 120 129 124 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 104
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 124
67% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2700 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $298

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback