bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1480 x 757 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 11:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 170
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 264
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-1B
Nvidia(10DE 1177) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.81
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40.3% Average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 65.2
53% 66.1 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20.7
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 13GB
11GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,437
Write 227
Mixed 443
220% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 91.4
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 14.4
161% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 91.1
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 115%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 121 131 131 118 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 39.7
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback