Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro9,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro9,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-6F01561E16C75D06
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 70
2-Core 148
59% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 199
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 2.75
3% 4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.65
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-256V2S-HP 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2C03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 236
Mixed 124
59% 270 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 18.5
54% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 13.1
55% 129 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 92%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
2GB free, PID a20b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 13 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 13.2
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro9,2 Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro9,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback