Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 34.2 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 30.9 19% 27.2 Pts	4-Core 59.4 8-Core 59.7 8% 59.6 Pts	64-Core 59.2 4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 106E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.61 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.7 2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hynix HCG8e 63GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 154 Write 81.3 Mixed 108 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 9.38 4K Mixed 4.46 30% 8.87 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 4.23 6% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 24%
Generic SL32G SD Card 32GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 28GB free Firmware: 8.0 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 82.8 Write 17.3 Mixed 21.6 30% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 22%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 444GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 103 Write 107 Mixed 101 134% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16